data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e01c8/e01c82ae9ad868ea1c3c783710554482b523d1e1" alt="Ublock origin firefox mobile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08e87/08e87cc0892cd8859a0401329267f4016583e14a" alt="ublock origin firefox mobile ublock origin firefox mobile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aa2b/4aa2bc8eca267507d3fe381ea401201af278b32f" alt="ublock origin firefox mobile ublock origin firefox mobile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a932/8a932b3548957771ce85c8489dbf9f2ff7031756" alt="ublock origin firefox mobile ublock origin firefox mobile"
I’d like to respond to you in a similar manner by saying it’s not nice to reply back with something false especially considering, I’m using Tor (Quantum Engine by Mozilla with uBo installed not because I dislike Brave but because I want Shields greatly enhanced from how it is functioning now, by implementing such enhancements as mentioned in the above research link pertaining to Machine Learning Ad&Track blocking and better support for Linux. So the question should be what is uBo doing that Brave isn’t and why isn’t Brave working on this aspect more effectively?
UBLOCK ORIGIN FIREFOX MOBILE INSTALL
It just doesn’t make sense to ask Brave to allow the install of other and another Ad&Track blocking tools/extensions considering one proprietary purpose of Brave is to block all Ads&Tracks. Secondly, I kindly asked you a similar question as well because I don’t have uBo installed in Brave. Hi firstly, I questioned almost the same thing you did to the new moderator, except I didn’t imply whether Shields was protecting (which is the wrong term to use) its users from ads, I essentially asked what would be the value of it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e01c8/e01c82ae9ad868ea1c3c783710554482b523d1e1" alt="Ublock origin firefox mobile"